四川金川：梨花铺就乡村振兴路

added 17 characters in body

Source Link

edited Jul 29 at 17:32

12.2k
25
169
289

I would like to reiterate what I said on the previous experiment: this is an experiment. Many people are reacting as if this is a permanent change, which isn't the case yet. We should discuss this post's merit as an experiment, not its merit as a change.

My personal opinion is that the 50 rep requirement was arbitrary to begin with, so we ought to experiment to figure out what it should be.

MyThat being said, my one concern about the metrics cited in the post is that it indicates that low-rep users posted 7.8% of comments but were responsible for approximately 26.4% of comment flags (133 out of 504) during the period of the experiment, which seems quite disproportionate. This suggests that 2 might be too low. Is it possible to break this down further by rep ranges (e.g. 2 - 10, 11 - 20, etc.)? (In fairness, though, that still represents only approximately 1.2% of comments posted, which is encouraging).

I'm also curious about two other metrics:

Did low-rep users end up with fewer posts in the VLQ queue?
Did low-rep users post more answers?

My personal opinion is that the 50 rep requirement was arbitrary to begin with, so we ought to experiment to figure out what it should be.

My one concern about the metrics cited in the post is that it indicates that low-rep users posted 7.8% of comments but were responsible for approximately 26.4% of comment flags (133 out of 504) during the period of the experiment, which seems quite disproportionate. This suggests that 2 might be too low. Is it possible to break this down further by rep ranges (e.g. 2 - 10, 11 - 20, etc.)? (In fairness, though, that still represents only approximately 1.2% of comments posted, which is encouraging).

I'm also curious about two other metrics:

Did low-rep users end up with fewer posts in the VLQ queue?
Did low-rep users post more answers?

My personal opinion is that the 50 rep requirement was arbitrary to begin with, so we ought to experiment to figure out what it should be.

That being said, my one concern about the metrics cited in the post is that it indicates that low-rep users posted 7.8% of comments but were responsible for approximately 26.4% of comment flags (133 out of 504) during the period of the experiment, which seems quite disproportionate. This suggests that 2 might be too low. Is it possible to break this down further by rep ranges (e.g. 2 - 10, 11 - 20, etc.)? (In fairness, though, that still represents only approximately 1.2% of comments posted, which is encouraging).

I'm also curious about two other metrics:

Did low-rep users end up with fewer posts in the VLQ queue?
Did low-rep users post more answers?

Source Link

answered Jul 29 at 17:27

EJoshuaS - Stand with Ukraine

12.2k
25
169
289

My personal opinion is that the 50 rep requirement was arbitrary to begin with, so we ought to experiment to figure out what it should be.

I'm also curious about two other metrics:

Did low-rep users end up with fewer posts in the VLQ queue?
Did low-rep users post more answers?

孩子咬指甲什么原因	什么人适合学玄学	什么光	每天做梦是什么原因引起	糖尿病人晚餐吃什么最好
木薯粉是什么做的	无间道是什么意思	为什么做完爱下面会疼	肝脏分泌什么	做无创需要注意什么
两性关系是什么意思	5.29什么星座	经常打饱嗝是什么原因	打耳洞后不能吃什么	ia是什么意思
顶嘴是什么意思	c类火灾是指什么	房客是什么意思	高枕无忧是什么意思	淀粉样变是什么病

人活着有什么意思hcv8jop5ns1r.cn	伤官格是什么意思hcv7jop6ns8r.cn	聚酯纤维是什么材料hcv8jop0ns7r.cn	尿酸高吃什么能降hcv8jop5ns2r.cn	外阴瘙痒用什么洗液hcv9jop2ns6r.cn
尾戒代表什么hcv9jop3ns8r.cn	淼念什么hcv8jop9ns9r.cn	总有眼屎是什么原因0735v.com	去越南要注意什么hcv8jop7ns0r.cn	中央候补委员什么级别hcv8jop4ns1r.cn
鹅蛋炒香菜治什么病hcv8jop6ns6r.cn	黄喉是牛的什么部位hcv9jop0ns7r.cn	大便次数增多是什么原因hcv7jop5ns1r.cn	白玫瑰适合送什么人sscsqa.com	辞职是什么意思baiqunet.com
西席是什么意思hcv9jop5ns4r.cn	36年属什么生肖hcv7jop9ns8r.cn	海澜之家属于什么档次hcv8jop5ns3r.cn	温婉是什么意思hcv8jop4ns1r.cn	美育是什么意思hcv7jop6ns7r.cn